University of Cambridge Home

Engineering department Home
me
Colm Durkan's
Scanning probe microscopy and Nanoelectronics group

   Nanoscience centre   


Scanning probe microscopy and nanoelectronics Group


                       About us  
Research  
People  
Publications  
Highlights and news  
Vacancies  
Links  
Nanoscience Centre  
STM

We are using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) to explore the electrical, structural and magnetic properties of a variety of molecular species.  We have developed an ultra-low current (down to below 100 fA) UHV STM for studies of the electronic spin states of single molecules.


        Au (111)                                    Au (111)   Au (111) surfaces  



    HOPG                     Superlattice on HOPG                   Graphite surfaces & superlattices



    C60 on Si(111)                    C60 on Si(111)                     Molecules on surfaces


STM on Graphite


    We are particularly interested in HOPG (Highly oriented pyrolytic graphite), and in the many intriciacies of performing STM on this material, which is one of the most commonly used substrates for STM.  Due to the weak coupling between adjacent layers of graphene, graphite has extremely low sliding friction, hence its use in lead pencils.  This propensity for sliding also means that the local stacking of sheets can be easily disrupted, and this can be directly probed using STM.  Through these sort of experiments, we can learn alot about the intriguing properties of this material.

    What happens when there is a mis-orientation of graphene layers?  We get a superlattice as shown below.  Here, we have shown two graphene sheets with atomic lattice constant, d, mis-oriented by an angle
Q, which leads to the formation of an interference pattern (known as a Moiré pattern - well-known from optics) with the same symmetry, but a superperiod, D.  The relationship between the various quantities is given by
         
            D = d/(2sin(Q/2))


              C60 on Si(111)   overlap ->  C60 on Si(111)


            In an STM image this looks like:


       Superlattice
 
    In this image, we can simulatneously observe the superlattice as well as the atomic lattice.  Note that the atomic lattice has triangular symmetry, whereas the arrangement of the carbon atoms is in fact hexagonal.  This has been a subject of great debate for over 25 years now, and is due to the AB (Bernal) stacking of the individual graphene sheets.  Essentially, the STM observes every second carbon atom (known as b-atoms), i.e. the ones which are above a vacancy in the layer immediately below.

    We have recently demosntrated that the STM tip can be used to modify the spacing between the layers locally due to the attractive forces between the tip and sample, and we can essentially decouple the top layer, so that acts like graphene.  This is observed in the image below where we have modified the tip-sample distance during a scan to decouple the top layer, whereby we see the triangular lattice in the upper part of the image, and the true hexagonal lattice in the lower part, whilst the top layer is decoupled.  
             

  deouple Superlattice  

               HOPG warps under the STM tip during scanning.  On the right image, for the bottom half, we have used the STM tip to decouple (lift) the top layer of graphene, and in the top half, we have reverted to the normal coupling. 

    This can be done in a controlled way as shown below.  Here we have a region on a piece of graphite (HOPG) where there usual stacking of the graphene sheets has been disrupted, resulting in a slight rotational misorientation between the top few layers at the Basal plane.  This manifests itself as a superlattice , which is apparent on the right hand half of the images.  In the superlattice region, the average interlayer spacing is slightly larger than usual, resulting in a reduced electronic coupling.  In the image on the left, the typical atomic resolution image of HOPG is observed (displaying triangular symmetry, thus showing every second C-atom) everywhere.  In the image on the right, where we have brought the STM tip closer to the surface, we still observe the triangular lattice on the left half, but now obtain the true atomic lattice (honeycomb, hexagonal symmetry) on the right half.  Due to the reduced interlayer coupling on the right, the STM tip is able to lift the top layer there by a few tenths of a nanometre, enough to decouple it almost completely, so it appears like graphene.


deoupledeouple 
           No decoupling: triangular lattice                              partial decoupling: trianglar lattice on left, honeycomb on right


Zoom-in on right-hand half of both images (image size ~ 0.8 nm x 0.8 nm):

  deouple              deouple
    Triangular lattice          Hexagonal lattice
 We can also simulate these images using a simple model which we developed (see publications list):


  
deouple      deouple
   Triangular lattice                      Hexagonal lattice

    We have also gone a step further and have carried out a study on the dependence of atomic mismatch between graphene sheets in graphite and the misorientation of the resulting superlattice domains. We have shown, through measurements of the atomic orientation of the top sheet and the angular misorientation between superlattice domains, that it is possible to compute the actual degree of atomic mismatch on the underlying graphene sheet in the case of a superlattice. We show that the odd-even transition is evident for superlattices with relatively small periodicity in the range 1–2 nm and less apparent for those with larger periodicity in the range 5–8 nm, and present a signature of the transition. We also demonstrated that the degree of interlayer coupling between graphene sheets depends on the extent of rotational mismatch in relation to interlayer spacing as has previously been predicted.

    deouple                        deouple          deouple
                                                           
Defect-high region of HOPG showing                     FFT from superlattice (measured)         FFT from superlattice (calculated)
two superlattices with different period                    showing satellite peaks associated          showing identical features
s
temming from two graphene sheets                        with superlattice & odd-even transition
with different rotational mismatch.
Different period also evident in FFT
(inset)          
See our paper in Phys. Rev. B on rotational disorder in graphite

                                    
 



 
Colm Durkan, University of Cambridge Engineering Department and Nanoscience centre, , 11 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FF, UK
Last updated June 2010.